Free but Shackled - The Java Trap
par Richard Stallman
Note
Since this article was first published, Sun has relicensed most of its Java platform under the GNU General Public License, and there is now a free Java development environment. Thus, the Java language is no longer a trap. Nonetheless, the general issue described here remains important, because any nonfree library or programming platform can cause a similar problem. We must learn a lesson from the history of Java, so we can avoid other traps in the future.
Veuillez aussi consulter : Le piège JavaScript
Le 12 avril 2004
If your program is free software, it is basically ethical—but there is a trap you must be on guard for. Your program, though in itself free, may be restricted by nonfree software that it depends on. Since the problem is most prominent today for Java programs, we call it the Java Trap.
A program is free software if its users have certain crucial freedoms. Roughly speaking, they are: the freedom to run the program, the freedom to study and change the source, the freedom to redistribute the source and binaries, and the freedom to publish improved versions. (See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html.) Whether any given program in source form is free software depends solely on the meaning of its license.
Whether the program can be used in the Free World, used by people who mean to live in freedom, is a more complex question. This is not determined by the program's own license alone, because no program works in isolation. Every program depends on other programs. For instance, a program needs to be compiled or interpreted, so it depends on a compiler or interpreter. If compiled into byte code, it depends on a byte-code interpreter. Moreover, it needs libraries in order to run, and it may also invoke other separate programs that run in other processes. All of these programs are dependencies. Dependencies may be necessary for the program to run at all, or they may be necessary only for certain features. Either way, all or part of the program cannot operate without the dependencies.
If some of a program's dependencies are nonfree, this means that all or part of the program is unable to run in an entirely free system—it is unusable in the Free World. Sure, we could redistribute the program and have copies on our machines, but that's not much good if it won't run. That program is free software, but it is effectively shackled by its nonfree dependencies.
This problem can occur in any kind of software, in any language. For instance, a free program that only runs on Microsoft Windows is clearly useless in the Free World. But software that runs on GNU/Linux can also be useless if it depends on other nonfree software. In the past, Motif (before we had LessTif) and Qt (before its developers made it free software) were major causes of this problem. Most 3D video cards work fully only with nonfree drivers, which also cause this problem. But the major source of this problem today is Java, because people who write free software often feel Java is sexy. Blinded by their attraction to the language, they overlook the issue of dependencies and fall into the Java Trap.
Sun's implementation of Java is nonfree. The standard Java libraries are nonfree also. We do have free implementations of Java, such as the GNU Compiler for Java (GCJ) and GNU Classpath, but they don't support all the features yet. We are still catching up.
Si vous développez un programme Java sur la plate-forme Java de Sun, vous êtes voués à utiliser des fonctionnalités Sun exclusives sans même vous en rendre compte. Vous pourriez les avoir utilisées pendant des mois avant même de vous en rendre compte et reprendre la tâche pourrait prendre plus de mois encore. Vous pourriez vous dire, « Recommencer demande trop de travail ». Alors votre programme sera tombé dans le Piège Java; il sera inutilisable dans le Monde Libre.
Le truc fiable pour éviter le Piège Java est de n'avoir qu'une implémentation libre de Java sur votre système. Ainsi, si vous utilisez une fonctionnalité ou une bibliothèque que le logiciel libre ne supporte pas encore, vous vous en rendrez compte immédiatement, et vous pourrez réécrire ce code tout de suite.
Sun continues to develop additional “standard” Java libraries, and nearly all of them are nonfree; in many cases, even a library's specification is a trade secret, and Sun's latest license for these specifications prohibits release of anything less than a full implementation of the specification. (See http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/JSPA2.pdf and http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr129/j2me_pb-1_0-fr-spec-license.html for examples).
Fortunately, that specification license does permit releasing an implementation as free software; others who receive the library can be allowed to change it and are not required to adhere to the specification. But the requirement has the effect of prohibiting the use of a collaborative development model to produce the free implementation. Use of that model would entail publishing incomplete versions, something those who have read the spec are not allowed to do.
In the early days of the Free Software Movement, it was impossible to avoid depending on nonfree programs. Before we had the GNU C compiler, every C program (free or not) depended on a nonfree C compiler. Before we had the GNU C library, every program depended on a nonfree C library. Before we had Linux, the first free kernel, every program depended on a nonfree kernel. Before we had Bash, every shell script had to be interpreted by a nonfree shell. It was inevitable that our first programs would initially be hampered by these dependencies, but we accepted this because our plan included rescuing them subsequently. Our overall goal, a self-hosting GNU operating system, included free replacements for all those dependencies; if we reached the goal, all our programs would be rescued. Thus it happened: with the GNU/Linux system, we can now run these programs on free platforms.
The situation is different today. We now have powerful free operating systems and many free programming tools. Whatever job you want to do, you can do it on a free platform; there is no need to accept a nonfree dependency even temporarily. The main reason people fall into the trap today is because they are not thinking about it. The easiest solution to the problem is to teach people to recognize it and not fall into it.
Afin de protéger votre code Java du Piège Java, installez un environnement de développement Java libre et utilisez-le. De façon générale, quel que soit le langage que vous utilisiez, ouvrez l'œil, et assurez-vous du statut libre des programmes dont dépend le code de vos programmes. La façon la plus simple de vérifier si ce programme est libre est de s'assurer qu'il possède une entrée dans le Répertoire des logiciels libres (http://www.fsf.org/directory). Si un programme n'est pas dans ce répertoire, vous pouvez vérifier si la licence qui l'accompagne est dans la liste des licences de logiciels libres (http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.fr.html).
We are trying to rescue the trapped Java programs, so if you like the Java language, we invite you to help in developing GNU Classpath. Trying your programs with the the GCJ Compiler and GNU Classpath, and reporting any problems you encounter in classes already implemented, is also useful. However, finishing GNU Classpath will take time; if more nonfree libraries continue to be added, we may never have all the latest ones. So please don't put your free software in shackles. When you write an application program today, write it to run on free facilities from the start.
Voir également :
Le curieux non-événement de Sun dans la pénombre